Thus far, I have really enjoyed Equiano's narrative. I thought the way he started, describing the culture and customs of his people, was really interesting. I admit that I didn't have much knowledge on African village life in the 18th century, and it was enlightening to learn that for the most part, their way of life was fairly similar to that of more "sophisticated" societies.
I think it was helpful to talk about the introduction in class, specifically to understand that this text was written to members of Parliament. One of the things I observed as I read was that Equiano's account seemed tamer than the experiences of others that I had read. While the conditions described aboard the slave ship, I got the sense that his account was slightly watered down. Maybe I'm wrong, but Equiano seems to be treading lightly throughout his novel regarding Western/English practices, and praises their culture numerous times. Overall, I've enjoyed what I have read so far and look forward to reading the remainder of the text.
I agree with your thoughts that Equiano is choosing his words carefully. It's a really smart move on his part. It gives him a chance to shift some power. Transculturation, as we learned.
ReplyDeleteThis is the first time I've read a first person account by someone who was abducted and forced into slavery, and I agree that it's so compelling to read about his life and perspectives about his village and compare them to his experiences in Europe and the colonies.
ReplyDelete